What if everything you think you know about rebranding is wrong?
In this no-nonsense episode, we tackle one of the most misunderstood topics in business: when to rebrand versus when to resist the urge. With a shocking 73% of rebranding initiatives failing to deliver measurable ROI within two years, we dive deep into why most founders get this decision spectacularly wrong. Discover the real reasons companies like Jaguar and Cracker Barrel alienated their loyal customers, when Toyota lost its way, and why startups should almost never touch their brand identity. We explore the critical difference between a brand refresh and a complete rebrand, reveal the hidden costs most founders never consider, and share the rare circumstances when a rebrand actually makes strategic sense. This episode will save you from one of the costliest mistakes in business.
The urge to rebrand often strikes at the worst possible moments. Founders sitting around conference tables, staring at stagnant growth numbers, suddenly get the brilliant idea that a fresh logo and new color scheme will magically solve their problems. It's the business equivalent of rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
Here's the uncomfortable truth: your brand probably isn't the problem. Most rebranding efforts stem from founder boredom or misplaced anxiety rather than genuine strategic necessity. When companies like Jaguar give the middle finger to their existing customers in pursuit of a younger demographic, or when Cracker Barrel abandons their core identity, they're making a bet that the grass is greener with a completely different customer base. Sometimes that bet pays off, but more often it backfires spectacularly.
The difference between a brand refresh and a complete rebrand matters enormously. Google and Apple constantly update their visual identity—tweaking logos, modernizing interfaces, adjusting color palettes. That's evolution, not revolution. A true rebrand means changing everything: your name, your domain, your legal structure, every invoice, proposal, and piece of marketing material you've ever created. It's an incredible amount of work that most founders vastly underestimate.
Your brand equity—the value built into how customers perceive you—gets reset to zero with every rebrand. Even if you only have a hundred customers, that recognition and trust you've built evaporates the moment you change your identity. For startups, this is particularly dangerous because you're already fighting an uphill battle for attention and credibility.
The rare circumstances when rebranding makes sense are surprisingly specific. When you acquire a legacy brand that's tired or associated with the wrong demographic, a strategic rebrand can attract new customers. When your business fundamentally changes direction—like shifting from general finance services to impact investing—your brand should evolve to match. When you face legal challenges like trademark infringement, you may have no choice. When your company values genuinely shift over time, your brand should reflect that evolution.
But here's the key insight: even necessary rebrands should happen as gradually as possible unless you're dealing with a genuine crisis. Take lessons from the companies that do this well. They don't leap from one identity to another overnight. They methodically progress over months or years, carrying their audience along rather than abandoning them.
The most successful approach treats your brand like a living thing that grows and adapts rather than something that needs periodic replacement. Your messaging can evolve, your visual identity can modernize, your product line can expand—all without throwing away the equity you've built. Save the dramatic rebrand for when you truly need to signal a fundamental transformation, not when you're just feeling restless about your quarterly numbers.
Watch the Full Episode on When to Rebrand (Hint: Almost Never) with Anthony Franco, Chris Franks, and Stephanie Hays below:
Follow us to watch live on YouTube and LinkedIn or listen to episodes on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.